PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .337vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Splitter 19%Curveball 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 482 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 SK Steven Kwan LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 633 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AM Angel Martínez SH .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 559 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 PB Patrick Bailey SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 394 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.