PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .334vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Splitter 20%Curveball 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 336 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 SK Steven Kwan LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 679 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 496 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AM Angel Martínez SH .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 603 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 PB Patrick Bailey SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.