PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .329vs RHH xwOBA .319Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Curveball 19%Splitter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .306
  1. 1 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 SK Steven Kwan LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 576 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KM Kyle Manzardo LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Manzardo
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DS Daniel Schneemann LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Schneemann
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 RH Rhys Hoskins RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rhys Hoskins
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .217 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 PB Patrick Bailey SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 364 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AH Austin Hedges RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Hedges
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-12 game page →