PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .336vs RHH xwOBA .310Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Splitter 20%Curveball 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 619 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .400 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .410 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 485 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TE Tommy Edman SH .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AF Alex Freeland SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-12 game page →