PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .334vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Splitter 20%Curveball 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 643 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .416 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.