PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .331vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Curveball 19%Splitter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 586 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 539 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.