PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .337vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Splitter 20%Curveball 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 637 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 592 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .239 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.