PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .334vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Splitter 20%Curveball 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 658 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 612 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TT Tim Tawa RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .238 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Jose Fernandez RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Fernandez
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.