PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .334vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Splitter 20%Curveball 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .303
  1. 1 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 HB Henry Bolte RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JH Jonah Heim SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MM Max Muncy RHB .279
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .239 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.