PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .336vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Splitter 19%Curveball 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .297
  1. 1 TS Tyler Soderstrom LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Soderstrom
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 HB Henry Bolte RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JH Jonah Heim SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MM Max Muncy RHB .277
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.