PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .315Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Curveball 19%Splitter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 10%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 411 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 NK Nick Kurtz LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Kurtz
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .419 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 MM Max Muncy RHB .278
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HB Henry Bolte RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JH Jonah Heim SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DH Darell Hernaiz RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Darell Hernaiz
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-03 game page →