PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .334vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Splitter 20%Curveball 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .302
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 470 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.