PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .334vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Splitter 20%Curveball 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .303
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JL Josh Lowe LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.