PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Phillips vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Phillips's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Phillips's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .329vs RHH xwOBA .322Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Sweeper 24%Curveball 19%Splitter 19%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Slider 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Phillips, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .306
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 421 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 519 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MT Mike Trout RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (24% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-07 game page →