PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Holton vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Holton's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Holton's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .283vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Cutter 30%Sinker 20%Sweeper 17%Changeup 16%Four-Seam Fastball 13%Curveball 4%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Holton, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 NK Nick Kurtz LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Kurtz
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 TS Tyler Soderstrom LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Soderstrom
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JH Jonah Heim SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HB Henry Bolte RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Cutter (30% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (13% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.