PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Glasnow vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Glasnow's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Glasnow's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .291vs RHH xwOBA .252Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Slider 21%Sinker 18%Curveball 13%Knuckle Curve 10%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Glasnow, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .361
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .420 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.