PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Glasnow vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Glasnow's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Glasnow's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .279vs RHH xwOBA .250Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Slider 21%Sinker 18%Curveball 16%Knuckle Curve 8%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Glasnow, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 483 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .426 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BH Brady House RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-05 game page →