PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Glasnow vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Glasnow's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Glasnow's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .291vs RHH xwOBA .252Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Slider 21%Sinker 18%Curveball 13%Knuckle Curve 10%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Glasnow, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 597 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Marcelo Mayer LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcelo Mayer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CK Christian Koss RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Jonah Cox RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .228 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  8. 8 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  9. 9 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.