PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Glasnow vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Glasnow's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Glasnow's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .291vs RHH xwOBA .257Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Slider 21%Sinker 18%Curveball 14%Knuckle Curve 9%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Glasnow, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CK Christian Koss RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  6. 6 JC Jonah Cox RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .215 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  8. 8 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TH Turner Hill LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Turner Hill
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-18 game page →