PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Alexander vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Alexander's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Alexander's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .305vs RHH xwOBA .323Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 22%Cutter 21%Sweeper 20%Changeup 19%Sinker 18%Unknown 1%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Alexander, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SK Steven Kwan LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 607 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AM Angel Martínez SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 533 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RH Rhys Hoskins RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rhys Hoskins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.