PITCHER MATCHUP

Tyler Alexander vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tyler Alexander's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tyler Alexander's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .306vs RHH xwOBA .327Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Cutter 22%Four-Seam Fastball 21%Sweeper 20%Sinker 18%Changeup 18%Unknown 1%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tyler Alexander, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 SK Steven Kwan LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 559 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KM Kyle Manzardo LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Manzardo
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DS Daniel Schneemann LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Schneemann
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RH Rhys Hoskins RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rhys Hoskins
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 PB Patrick Bailey SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 DF David Fry SH .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Fry
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-29 game page →