PITCHER MATCHUP

Trey Yesavage vs Seattle Mariners

How the Seattle Mariners's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Trey Yesavage's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Trey Yesavage's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .301vs RHH xwOBA .263Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 46%Splitter 30%Slider 25%

How the Seattle Mariners's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Seattle Mariners's top-9-by-AB hitters against Trey Yesavage, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 JR Julio Rodríguez RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Julio Rodríguez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (30% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JN Josh Naylor LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Naylor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 464 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (30% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 CY Cole Young LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (30% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 RA Randy Arozarena RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randy Arozarena
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (30% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JC J.P. Crawford LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.P. Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (30% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CR Cal Raleigh SH .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cal Raleigh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 551 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (30% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LR Luke Raley LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Raley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (30% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DC Dominic Canzone LHB .358
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Canzone
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (30% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 CE Colt Emerson LHB .277
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Emerson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (30% usage) projects to .233 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-05 game page →