PITCHER MATCHUP

Trey Gibson vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Trey Gibson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Trey Gibson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .394vs RHH xwOBA .347Seasons 2026
Sinker 23%Four-Seam Fastball 22%Slider 21%Cutter 20%Curveball 14%Sweeper 2%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Trey Gibson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 509 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .443 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.