PITCHER MATCHUP

Trey Gibson vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Trey Gibson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Trey Gibson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .367vs RHH xwOBA .357Seasons 2026
Sinker 27%Slider 21%Cutter 19%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Curveball 14%Sweeper 2%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Trey Gibson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .439 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 392 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DR Drew Romo SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Romo
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-30 game page →