PITCHER MATCHUP

Trey Gibson vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Trey Gibson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Trey Gibson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .406vs RHH xwOBA .372Seasons 2026
Sinker 25%Slider 21%Four-Seam Fastball 20%Cutter 19%Curveball 13%Sweeper 2%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Trey Gibson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .436 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.