PITCHER MATCHUP

Trey Gibson vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Trey Gibson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Trey Gibson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .406vs RHH xwOBA .372Seasons 2026
Sinker 25%Slider 21%Four-Seam Fastball 20%Cutter 19%Curveball 13%Sweeper 2%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Trey Gibson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 622 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 519 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .356
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .417 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 494 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TE Tommy Edman SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AF Alex Freeland SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.