PITCHER MATCHUP

Trey Gibson vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Trey Gibson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Trey Gibson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .406vs RHH xwOBA .372Seasons 2026
Sinker 25%Slider 21%Four-Seam Fastball 20%Cutter 19%Curveball 13%Sweeper 2%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Trey Gibson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 573 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 467 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .411 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.