PITCHER MATCHUP

Trey Gibson vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Trey Gibson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Trey Gibson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .406vs RHH xwOBA .372Seasons 2026
Sinker 31%Cutter 22%Slider 17%Curveball 15%Four-Seam Fastball 14%Sweeper 2%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Trey Gibson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (14% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (14% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (14% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .361
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .414 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (14% usage) projects to .411 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (14% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 401 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 AF Alex Freeland SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (14% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-19 game page →