PITCHER MATCHUP

Trey Gibson vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Trey Gibson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Trey Gibson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .394vs RHH xwOBA .347Seasons 2026
Sinker 23%Four-Seam Fastball 22%Slider 21%Cutter 20%Curveball 14%Sweeper 2%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Trey Gibson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .329
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 643 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .427 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 AF Alex Freeland SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.