PITCHER MATCHUP

Trey Gibson vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Trey Gibson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Trey Gibson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .406vs RHH xwOBA .372Seasons 2026
Sinker 25%Slider 21%Four-Seam Fastball 20%Cutter 19%Curveball 13%Sweeper 2%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Trey Gibson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 468 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 515 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .240 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.