PITCHER MATCHUP

Trey Gibson vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Trey Gibson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Trey Gibson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .406vs RHH xwOBA .372Seasons 2026
Sinker 25%Slider 21%Four-Seam Fastball 20%Cutter 19%Curveball 13%Sweeper 2%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Trey Gibson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 519 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MT Mike Trout RHB .358
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .408 xwOBA over 437 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.