PITCHER MATCHUP

Trey Gibson vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Trey Gibson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Trey Gibson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .382vs RHH xwOBA .373Seasons 2026
Sinker 27%Slider 20%Cutter 20%Four-Seam Fastball 16%Curveball 14%Sweeper 2%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Trey Gibson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 398 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 482 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TH Tyler Heineman SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Heineman
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-24 game page →