PITCHER MATCHUP

Tobias Myers vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tobias Myers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tobias Myers's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .308vs RHH xwOBA .342Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Cutter 18%Slider 18%Splitter 14%Changeup 4%Curveball 2%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tobias Myers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 570 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 389 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TF TJ Friedl LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Friedl
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .228 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 NM Noelvi Marte RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Noelvi Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DM Dane Myers RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.