PITCHER MATCHUP

Tobias Myers vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tobias Myers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tobias Myers's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .285vs RHH xwOBA .339Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Cutter 18%Slider 18%Splitter 13%Changeup 4%Curveball 2%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tobias Myers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SS Spencer Steer RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Steer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Matt McLain RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 464 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JB JJ Bleday LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BD Blake Dunn RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Blake Dunn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DM Dane Myers RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (13% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.