PITCHER MATCHUP

Tobias Myers vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tobias Myers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tobias Myers's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .295vs RHH xwOBA .341Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Cutter 18%Slider 17%Splitter 16%Changeup 3%Curveball 2%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tobias Myers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 624 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 MM Matt McLain RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 551 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DM Dane Myers RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 KH Ke'Bryan Hayes RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ke'Bryan Hayes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NM Noelvi Marte RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Noelvi Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.