PITCHER MATCHUP

Tobias Myers vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tobias Myers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tobias Myers's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .302vs RHH xwOBA .339Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Cutter 18%Slider 17%Splitter 15%Changeup 4%Curveball 2%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tobias Myers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 609 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 541 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Matt McLain RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DM Dane Myers RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 TF TJ Friedl LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Friedl
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .226 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 KH Ke'Bryan Hayes RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ke'Bryan Hayes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (15% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.