PITCHER MATCHUP

Tatsuya Imai vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tatsuya Imai's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tatsuya Imai's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .374vs RHH xwOBA .290Seasons 2026
Slider 45%Four-Seam Fastball 44%Sinker 5%Changeup 3%Splitter 3%Curveball 1%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tatsuya Imai, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Slider (45% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 375 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .229 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Slider (45% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Slider (45% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 377 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Slider (45% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Slider (45% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OC Owen Caissie LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Slider (45% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JM Joe Mack LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Slider (45% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 GC Griffin Conine LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Slider (45% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AR Agustín Ramírez RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Agustín Ramírez
    • Slider (45% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.