PITCHER MATCHUP

Tatsuya Imai vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tatsuya Imai's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tatsuya Imai's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .386vs RHH xwOBA .278Seasons 2026
Slider 44%Four-Seam Fastball 43%Sinker 6%Changeup 3%Splitter 3%Curveball 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tatsuya Imai, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JA Jo Adell RHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 516 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .233 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JL Josh Lowe LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-27 game page →