PITCHER MATCHUP

Tanner Gordon vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tanner Gordon's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tanner Gordon's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .338vs RHH xwOBA .361Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 46%Slider 26%Changeup 21%Curveball 5%Sinker 3%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tanner Gordon, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JY Jacob Young RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Dylan Crews RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JT José Tena LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Tena
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-26 game page →