PITCHER MATCHUP

Tanner Gordon vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tanner Gordon's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tanner Gordon's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .349vs RHH xwOBA .362Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Slider 27%Changeup 21%Curveball 4%Sinker 4%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tanner Gordon, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 554 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 626 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 WA Willy Adames RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 565 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 367 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .410 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 EH Eric Haase RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eric Haase
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-05 game page →