PITCHER MATCHUP

Tanner Gordon vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tanner Gordon's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tanner Gordon's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .336vs RHH xwOBA .360Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 46%Slider 24%Changeup 21%Curveball 6%Sinker 2%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tanner Gordon, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 649 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 605 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-24 game page →