PITCHER MATCHUP

Tanner Bibee vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tanner Bibee's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tanner Bibee's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .292Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Cutter 23%Sinker 16%Changeup 16%Sweeper 9%Curveball 8%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tanner Bibee, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 498 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .409 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.