PITCHER MATCHUP

Tanner Bibee vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tanner Bibee's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tanner Bibee's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .300Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 29%Cutter 24%Changeup 16%Sinker 15%Sweeper 10%Curveball 7%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tanner Bibee, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 384 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .411 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 EQ Edgar Quero SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edgar Quero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-24 game page →