PITCHER MATCHUP

Tanner Bibee vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tanner Bibee's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tanner Bibee's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .301Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 29%Cutter 23%Changeup 16%Sinker 14%Sweeper 10%Curveball 7%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tanner Bibee, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 RG Riley Greene LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 467 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MV Matt Vierling RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Vierling
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WP Wenceel Pérez SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wenceel Pérez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 KC Kerry Carpenter LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kerry Carpenter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.