PITCHER MATCHUP

Tanner Bibee vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tanner Bibee's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tanner Bibee's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .317vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 29%Cutter 24%Changeup 16%Sinker 15%Sweeper 9%Curveball 7%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tanner Bibee, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 564 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JJ Josh Jung RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Burger RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JP Joc Pederson LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CS Corey Seager LHB .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 377 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KH Kyle Higashioka RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Higashioka
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AO Alejandro Osuna LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Osuna
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-30 game page →