PITCHER MATCHUP

Tanner Bibee vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tanner Bibee's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tanner Bibee's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .295Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Cutter 23%Sinker 16%Changeup 15%Sweeper 9%Curveball 8%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tanner Bibee, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 608 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JP Joc Pederson LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 EC Evan Carter LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .362
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Justin Foscue RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Foscue
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.