PITCHER MATCHUP

Tanner Bibee vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tanner Bibee's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tanner Bibee's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .293Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Cutter 23%Sinker 16%Changeup 16%Sweeper 9%Curveball 8%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tanner Bibee, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 660 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Justin Foscue RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Foscue
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.