PITCHER MATCHUP

Tanner Bibee vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tanner Bibee's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tanner Bibee's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .322vs RHH xwOBA .293Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Cutter 23%Sinker 16%Changeup 16%Sweeper 9%Curveball 8%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tanner Bibee, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JM Joe Mack LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 OC Owen Caissie LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 GC Griffin Conine LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .408 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.