PITCHER MATCHUP

Tanner Bibee vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tanner Bibee's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tanner Bibee's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .297Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Cutter 23%Sinker 16%Changeup 16%Sweeper 9%Curveball 8%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tanner Bibee, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .327
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .366
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 495 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 538 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-31 game page →