PITCHER MATCHUP

Tanner Bibee vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tanner Bibee's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tanner Bibee's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .295Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Cutter 23%Sinker 16%Changeup 16%Sweeper 9%Curveball 8%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tanner Bibee, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 634 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 586 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .363
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 520 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .233 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.