PITCHER MATCHUP

Tanner Bibee vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tanner Bibee's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tanner Bibee's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .292Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Cutter 23%Sinker 16%Changeup 16%Sweeper 9%Curveball 8%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tanner Bibee, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 485 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 514 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 HB Henry Bolte RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 JH Jonah Heim SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 487 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 MM Max Muncy RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-19 game page →