PITCHER MATCHUP

Tanner Banks vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tanner Banks's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tanner Banks's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .305vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 35%Four-Seam Fastball 23%Sweeper 22%Sinker 13%Changeup 7%Unknown 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tanner Banks, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 601 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 457 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.