PITCHER MATCHUP

Tanner Banks vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tanner Banks's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tanner Banks's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .301vs RHH xwOBA .312Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 35%Four-Seam Fastball 23%Sweeper 22%Sinker 13%Changeup 7%Unknown 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tanner Banks, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 570 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 313 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 524 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.