PITCHER MATCHUP

Tanner Banks vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tanner Banks's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tanner Banks's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .301vs RHH xwOBA .312Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 35%Four-Seam Fastball 23%Sweeper 22%Sinker 13%Changeup 7%Unknown 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tanner Banks, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 522 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 370 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.