PITCHER MATCHUP

Taj Bradley vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Taj Bradley's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Taj Bradley's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Cutter 23%Splitter 18%Curveball 11%Sinker 3%Unknown 1%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Taj Bradley, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .404 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.