PITCHER MATCHUP

Taj Bradley vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Taj Bradley's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Taj Bradley's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Cutter 23%Splitter 18%Curveball 11%Sinker 3%Unknown 1%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Taj Bradley, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KK Kyle Karros RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.