PITCHER MATCHUP

Taj Bradley vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Taj Bradley's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Taj Bradley's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .319vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Cutter 23%Splitter 19%Curveball 11%Sinker 3%Unknown 1%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Taj Bradley, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 WC Willi Castro SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willi Castro
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 501 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KK Kyle Karros RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 TF Tyler Freeman RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.