PITCHER MATCHUP

Taj Bradley vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Taj Bradley's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Taj Bradley's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Cutter 23%Splitter 18%Curveball 11%Sinker 3%Unknown 1%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Taj Bradley, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 375 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 WC Willi Castro SH .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willi Castro
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KK Kyle Karros RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 394 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.