PITCHER MATCHUP

Taj Bradley vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Taj Bradley's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Taj Bradley's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .326vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 42%Cutter 23%Splitter 18%Curveball 12%Sinker 4%Unknown 1%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Taj Bradley, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 WC Willi Castro SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willi Castro
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KK Kyle Karros RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 EJ Edouard Julien LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edouard Julien
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TF Tyler Freeman RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-26 game page →