PITCHER MATCHUP

Taj Bradley vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Taj Bradley's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Taj Bradley's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Cutter 23%Splitter 18%Curveball 11%Sinker 3%Unknown 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Taj Bradley, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 621 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .440 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .362
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .405 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 BS Bryson Stott LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 JC Justin Crawford LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH Derek Hill RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Derek Hill
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.