PITCHER MATCHUP

Taj Bradley vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Taj Bradley's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Taj Bradley's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Cutter 23%Splitter 18%Curveball 11%Sinker 3%Unknown 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Taj Bradley, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 499 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 719 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .356
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 620 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .443 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .363
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 578 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.