PITCHER MATCHUP

Taj Bradley vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Taj Bradley's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Taj Bradley's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Cutter 23%Splitter 19%Curveball 11%Sinker 3%Unknown 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Taj Bradley, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AB Alec Bohm RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BH Bryce Harper LHB .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 421 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .360
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 568 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .446 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 529 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-13 game page →