PITCHER MATCHUP

Taj Bradley vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Taj Bradley's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Taj Bradley's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Cutter 23%Splitter 18%Curveball 11%Sinker 3%Unknown 1%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Taj Bradley, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 624 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 WA Willy Adames RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 597 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MC Matt Chapman RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Chapman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 468 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MM Marcelo Mayer LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcelo Mayer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 CK Christian Koss RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.