PITCHER MATCHUP

Taj Bradley vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Taj Bradley's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Taj Bradley's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Cutter 23%Splitter 18%Curveball 11%Sinker 3%Unknown 1%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Taj Bradley, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CK Christian Koss RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC Jonah Cox RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .238 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 VB Victor Bericoto RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Bericoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-22 game page →