PITCHER MATCHUP

Taj Bradley vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Taj Bradley's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Taj Bradley's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Cutter 23%Splitter 18%Curveball 11%Sinker 3%Unknown 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Taj Bradley, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .327
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 658 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 612 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TT Tim Tawa RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Jose Fernandez RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Fernandez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.