PITCHER MATCHUP

Taj Bradley vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Taj Bradley's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Taj Bradley's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .327vs RHH xwOBA .310Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 42%Cutter 23%Splitter 18%Curveball 12%Sinker 4%Unknown 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Taj Bradley, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .362
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 495 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 389 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LG Lourdes Gurriel Jr. RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lourdes Gurriel Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 JB Jorge Barrosa SH .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Barrosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-20 game page →