PITCHER MATCHUP

Taj Bradley vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Taj Bradley's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Taj Bradley's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Cutter 23%Splitter 18%Curveball 11%Sinker 3%Unknown 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Taj Bradley, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .327
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 642 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 596 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 341 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.