PITCHER MATCHUP

Taj Bradley vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Taj Bradley's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Taj Bradley's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .317vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Cutter 23%Splitter 19%Curveball 11%Sinker 4%Unknown 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Taj Bradley, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 499 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 592 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 546 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.