PITCHER MATCHUP

Taj Bradley vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Taj Bradley's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Taj Bradley's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Cutter 23%Splitter 18%Curveball 11%Sinker 3%Unknown 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Taj Bradley, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 580 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 515 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 408 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.