PITCHER MATCHUP

Taj Bradley vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Taj Bradley's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Taj Bradley's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Cutter 23%Splitter 18%Curveball 11%Sinker 3%Unknown 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Taj Bradley, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 604 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 538 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CY Christian Yelich LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DH David Hamilton LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 537 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.