PITCHER MATCHUP

Spencer Miles vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Spencer Miles's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Spencer Miles's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .237Seasons 2026
Sinker 42%Curveball 24%Slider 17%Four-Seam Fastball 16%Unknown 1%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Spencer Miles, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TP Tristan Peters LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.