PITCHER MATCHUP

Spencer Miles vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Spencer Miles's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Spencer Miles's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .315vs RHH xwOBA .252Seasons 2026
Sinker 40%Curveball 25%Slider 18%Four-Seam Fastball 17%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Spencer Miles, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-17 game page →