PITCHER MATCHUP

Spencer Miles vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Spencer Miles's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Spencer Miles's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .295vs RHH xwOBA .244Seasons 2026
Sinker 44%Curveball 24%Slider 17%Four-Seam Fastball 15%Unknown 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Spencer Miles, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Justin Foscue RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Foscue
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (15% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.