PITCHER MATCHUP

Spencer Arrighetti vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Spencer Arrighetti's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Spencer Arrighetti's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .367vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Curveball 28%Sweeper 13%Cutter 11%Changeup 8%Sinker 8%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Spencer Arrighetti, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 421 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .430 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 EQ Edgar Quero SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edgar Quero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (28% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-24 game page →