PITCHER MATCHUP

Sonny Gray vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sonny Gray's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sonny Gray's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .303vs RHH xwOBA .301Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 21%Sweeper 19%Sinker 18%Curveball 17%Cutter 16%Changeup 7%Slider 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sonny Gray, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .238 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JL Josh Lowe LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 WM Wade Meckler LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-04 game page →