PITCHER MATCHUP

Slade Cecconi vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Slade Cecconi's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Slade Cecconi's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .336vs RHH xwOBA .332Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Curveball 15%Sinker 14%Slider 13%Cutter 13%Changeup 5%Sweeper 3%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Slade Cecconi, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .423 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 392 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 DR Drew Romo SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Romo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-02 game page →