PITCHER MATCHUP

Slade Cecconi vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Slade Cecconi's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Slade Cecconi's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .345vs RHH xwOBA .333Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 36%Curveball 15%Sinker 14%Cutter 14%Slider 12%Changeup 5%Sweeper 3%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Slade Cecconi, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .426 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.