PITCHER MATCHUP

Slade Cecconi vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Slade Cecconi's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Slade Cecconi's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .342vs RHH xwOBA .330Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 36%Curveball 15%Sinker 14%Cutter 14%Slider 12%Changeup 5%Sweeper 3%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Slade Cecconi, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 510 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .431 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.