PITCHER MATCHUP

Slade Cecconi vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Slade Cecconi's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Slade Cecconi's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .336vs RHH xwOBA .334Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Curveball 15%Sinker 14%Cutter 13%Slider 13%Changeup 5%Sweeper 3%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Slade Cecconi, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 JB Josh Bell SH .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 466 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BL Brooks Lee SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BB Byron Buxton RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Byron Buxton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 377 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 KC Kody Clemens SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AM Austin Martin RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 VC Victor Caratini SH .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RL Royce Lewis RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-08 game page →