PITCHER MATCHUP

Slade Cecconi vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Slade Cecconi's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Slade Cecconi's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .345vs RHH xwOBA .333Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 36%Curveball 15%Sinker 14%Cutter 14%Slider 12%Changeup 5%Sweeper 3%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Slade Cecconi, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 599 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Matt McLain RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DM Dane Myers RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 TF TJ Friedl LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Friedl
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .228 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 EA Edwin Arroyo SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edwin Arroyo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.