PITCHER MATCHUP

Slade Cecconi vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Slade Cecconi's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Slade Cecconi's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .341vs RHH xwOBA .333Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 36%Curveball 15%Sinker 15%Cutter 13%Slider 12%Changeup 5%Sweeper 3%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Slade Cecconi, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 494 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .238 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 BB Brett Baty LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 FL Francisco Lindor SH .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 557 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LT Luis Torrens RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Torrens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JY Jared Young LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-05 game page →