PITCHER MATCHUP

Slade Cecconi vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Slade Cecconi's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Slade Cecconi's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .343vs RHH xwOBA .332Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 36%Curveball 15%Sinker 14%Cutter 14%Slider 12%Changeup 5%Sweeper 3%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Slade Cecconi, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .330
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .239 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 BB Brett Baty LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 FL Francisco Lindor SH .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 618 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JS Juan Soto LHB .398
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .447 xwOBA over 477 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JY Jared Young LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.