PITCHER MATCHUP

Slade Cecconi vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Slade Cecconi's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Slade Cecconi's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .344vs RHH xwOBA .333Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 36%Curveball 15%Sinker 14%Cutter 14%Slider 12%Changeup 5%Sweeper 3%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Slade Cecconi, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 570 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 313 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 524 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.