PITCHER MATCHUP

Slade Cecconi vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Slade Cecconi's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Slade Cecconi's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .337vs RHH xwOBA .337Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 40%Curveball 15%Sinker 13%Cutter 12%Slider 12%Changeup 6%Sweeper 3%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Slade Cecconi, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 WC William Contreras RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BT Brice Turang LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .400 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SF Sal Frelick LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 LR Luis Rengifo SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Rengifo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DH David Hamilton LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CY Christian Yelich LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JC Jackson Chourio RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 361 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-16 game page →