PITCHER MATCHUP

Slade Cecconi vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Slade Cecconi's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Slade Cecconi's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .341vs RHH xwOBA .333Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 36%Curveball 15%Sinker 15%Cutter 13%Slider 12%Changeup 5%Sweeper 3%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Slade Cecconi, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 522 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 370 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.