PITCHER MATCHUP

Shane McClanahan vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Shane McClanahan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Shane McClanahan's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .335vs RHH xwOBA .315Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Changeup 28%Slider 18%Curveball 15%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Shane McClanahan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .406 xwOBA over 345 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 584 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 529 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.