PITCHER MATCHUP

Shane McClanahan vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Shane McClanahan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Shane McClanahan's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Changeup 29%Slider 18%Curveball 14%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Shane McClanahan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.