PITCHER MATCHUP

Shane McClanahan vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Shane McClanahan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Shane McClanahan's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .325vs RHH xwOBA .319Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Changeup 29%Slider 19%Curveball 14%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Shane McClanahan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 522 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BR Ben Rice LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .406 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JC José Caballero RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 467 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AW Austin Wells LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AR Amed Rosario RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Amed Rosario
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-08 game page →