PITCHER MATCHUP

Sean Sullivan vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sean Sullivan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sean Sullivan's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .379vs RHH xwOBA .314Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 46%Sweeper 18%Changeup 16%Cutter 15%Sinker 6%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sean Sullivan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 592 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 591 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CK Christian Koss RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 VB Victor Bericoto RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Bericoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.