PITCHER MATCHUP

Sean Burke vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sean Burke's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sean Burke's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .325vs RHH xwOBA .333Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Knuckle Curve 23%Slider 20%Sinker 9%Changeup 5%Cutter 2%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sean Burke, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 498 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 BR Ben Rice LHB .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .406 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JC José Caballero RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AR Amed Rosario RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Amed Rosario
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JE J.C. Escarra LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.C. Escarra
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Anthony Volpe RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Anthony Volpe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-18 game page →