PITCHER MATCHUP

Sean Burke vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sean Burke's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sean Burke's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .324Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 40%Knuckle Curve 21%Slider 20%Sinker 10%Cutter 5%Changeup 4%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sean Burke, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .333
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .360
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .405 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 570 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC José Caballero RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AW Austin Wells LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 AJ Aaron Judge RHB .402
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Aaron Judge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .425 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .462 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .442 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.