PITCHER MATCHUP

Sean Burke vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sean Burke's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sean Burke's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .309vs RHH xwOBA .327Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 40%Knuckle Curve 22%Slider 20%Sinker 10%Changeup 5%Cutter 3%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sean Burke, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .362
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .411 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 483 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC José Caballero RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 401 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 480 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AW Austin Wells LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JD Jasson Domínguez SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jasson Domínguez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AR Amed Rosario RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Amed Rosario
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.