PITCHER MATCHUP

Sean Burke vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sean Burke's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sean Burke's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .310vs RHH xwOBA .325Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 40%Knuckle Curve 22%Slider 19%Sinker 10%Cutter 6%Changeup 4%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sean Burke, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JP Joc Pederson LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.