PITCHER MATCHUP

Sean Burke vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sean Burke's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sean Burke's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .313vs RHH xwOBA .324Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 40%Knuckle Curve 22%Slider 20%Sinker 10%Changeup 4%Cutter 4%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sean Burke, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BB Brett Baty LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 FL Francisco Lindor SH .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 580 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JY Jared Young LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LT Luis Torrens RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Torrens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.