PITCHER MATCHUP

Sean Burke vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sean Burke's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sean Burke's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .317vs RHH xwOBA .324Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 40%Knuckle Curve 21%Slider 19%Sinker 10%Cutter 6%Changeup 4%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sean Burke, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 SK Steven Kwan LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 661 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 482 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 590 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AM Angel Martínez SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 PB Patrick Bailey SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (21% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.