PITCHER MATCHUP

Sean Burke vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sean Burke's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sean Burke's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .312vs RHH xwOBA .323Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 40%Knuckle Curve 22%Slider 20%Sinker 10%Changeup 5%Cutter 3%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sean Burke, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 SK Steven Kwan LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 594 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JR José Ramírez SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 AM Angel Martínez SH .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RH Rhys Hoskins RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rhys Hoskins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 PB Patrick Bailey SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 381 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 AH Austin Hedges RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Hedges
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.