PITCHER MATCHUP

Sean Burke vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sean Burke's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sean Burke's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .325vs RHH xwOBA .333Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Knuckle Curve 22%Slider 20%Sinker 9%Changeup 5%Cutter 3%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sean Burke, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .307
  1. 1 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SK Steven Kwan LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 549 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Kyle Manzardo LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Manzardo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 DS Daniel Schneemann LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Schneemann
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 RH Rhys Hoskins RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rhys Hoskins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 PB Patrick Bailey SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 DF David Fry SH .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Fry
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AH Austin Hedges RHB .267
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Hedges
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .236 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-23 game page →