PITCHER MATCHUP

Sean Burke vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sean Burke's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sean Burke's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .309vs RHH xwOBA .327Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 40%Knuckle Curve 22%Slider 20%Sinker 10%Changeup 5%Cutter 3%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sean Burke, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .326
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 566 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.