PITCHER MATCHUP

Sean Burke vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sean Burke's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sean Burke's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .312vs RHH xwOBA .335Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 40%Knuckle Curve 22%Slider 20%Sinker 9%Changeup 5%Cutter 3%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sean Burke, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 NK Nick Kurtz LHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Kurtz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 TS Tyler Soderstrom LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Soderstrom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 HB Henry Bolte RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-10 game page →