PITCHER MATCHUP

Sandy Alcantara vs Pittsburgh Pirates

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sandy Alcantara's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sandy Alcantara's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .339vs RHH xwOBA .285Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 26%Changeup 22%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Cutter 14%Slider 14%Sweeper 5%Curveball 2%

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Pittsburgh Pirates's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sandy Alcantara, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 BR Bryan Reynolds SH .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryan Reynolds
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 555 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BL Brandon Lowe SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Lowe
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 NG Nick Gonzales RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Gonzales
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JM Jake Mangum SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Mangum
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 RO Ryan O'Hearn LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan O'Hearn
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 SH Spencer Horwitz LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Horwitz
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OC Oneil Cruz LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oneil Cruz
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JT Jared Triolo RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Triolo
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 KG Konnor Griffin RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Konnor Griffin
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.